The Stone Man – Luke Smitherd – [Book Review]

There are two reviews one can write for Smitherd’s break-out 2012 novel The Stone Man. The first disregards the typos, missing words and other stylistic howlers…

And the other, does not.

I’ll therefore leave the latter for later, so you can stop reading if you think it unfair to criticise the editing of a self-published author. I’m still undecided as to whether it’s acceptable – at the fourth published version, no less – to still contain mistakes of this quantity.

But let’s say polish and quality don’t matter. Let’s say a story should be measured only on its characters, its immersive writing, its pacing and its emotional impact. How well does it do on the story-telling front?

(Note: contains some spoilers.)

A rock and a hard race

The Stone Man recounts, through transcribed audio recordings, two men’s encounters with a mysterious, unstoppable alien automaton: a giant man-shaped monster made of stone that ploughs directly towards its target, destroying everything in its unalterable path as it hunts its human prey, apparently randomly selected for harvesting.

Through quirks of the brain, the protagonist Andy, a journalist with Asperger’s, and his companion Paul, who has recovered from brain damage after a car accident, discover they can intercept signals emitted from the invaders, allowing them to ascertain their targets and see through their eyes. This information becomes invaluable to the military and thrusts the pair into the media limelight.

It’s a good premise – an indomitable, unthinking monster hunts its prey as mankind desperately seeks ways to halt the destruction – but there’s a huge amount of filler that does nothing for the story. With a healthy edit, it would have made a killer short story, but as it is, we’re treated to a chapter of media training, another in bullet points of uninteresting chronological tedium (bullet points!) and paragraph upon paragraph of immaterial and mundane detail.

For example: the protagonist at one point spends three pages explaining how he gets hold of a motorbike, complete with his bike-owning history, his licences held, how he contacts a bike owners’ Facebook forum that he’s a member of, descriptions of his friend Dan’s three bikes, and how Dan rides one of them to Andy, with his wife following in the family Hyundai. The parenthesis in this extract is astonishing in its utterly uninteresting inclusion:

“Forty-five minutes later (more than enough time to sort out temporary insurance online via my phone) Dan rode up to the McDonald’s car park on the bike…”

Who cares where he got insurance, or how, or even that he got it or not?! It has ZERO IMPORTANCE. Just steal a bike, for God’s sake, or have your character still own one, or anything.

Not only is it a dull way for the character to acquire a bike, it’s also rather out of character. Andy has Asperger’s and (in his own words) “generally avoid[s] conversation with strangers full stop”, and his “circle of friends has always been small and selective” – yet here we find he has reached out to Facebook for friends interested in bikes… actively seeking out conversation with strangers and pushing his circle of friends out to the internet.

Similarly, the chapters between Stone Man visitations – whether that be military debriefs or Andy’s media career in bullet points – is inconsequential and begging to be cut. I mean – bullet points! If it’s not interesting enough to put into a scene, why am I reading it?

In the flesh

So, the pacing is flawed, fluffed up to reach the size of a novel; but are the characters fleshed out and relatable?

Well, yes and no. Andy’s agency is strong – he wants to break the big story – but his Asperger’s is inconsistent and more a plot device than a characterisation.

Meanwhile, Paul is fairly consistent, though his northern accent – initially so accentuated in word-choice and syntax – soon fades. He’s also a bit stereotypically “ruddy northern”, but it’s not distracting. There’s not a lot to get excited about though.

Then there’s Brigadier Straub, the military envoy in charge of nullifying the alien threat. By Smitherd’s own admission, Straub is only female because his beta readers felt the story lacked female characters, so, while she is well drawn and consistent, the number of times we’re reminded of her stern professionalism smacks of overkill. It feels Smitherd is trying to convince himself such a woman might exist, rather than simply introducing her and letting her actions denote her personality (a bit of telling rather than showing).

Indeed, he says in his acknowledgements he Googled “highest ranking female officer in the British army” and found a Brigadier, but why not promote your fictional character – she’s not real; this is fiction, after all. I mean, Britain did in real life: the promotion of Susan Ridge to Major General in 2015 trumps his Brigadier (yes, I can Google too). And wouldn’t the highest possible rank be employed to counter an extra-terrestrial threat?

Bump the woman up, man! It won’t harm the believability of your alien invasion book to have a woman hold a position beyond precedent. 24 had a female president, and no one was saying “I don’t like this story; it’s portrayal of women in roles of power is unrealistic and an affront to my gender bias”.

Impact assessment

Unfortunately, the excessive detail and extended periods of trite dialogue detract from the book’s emotional impact. The novel’s resolution is so uncompromisingly boring, simply because it takes 300 pages to reach. And yet, it has the hallmarks of being genuinely haunting, were it punched out in 20,000 words.

Not to mention the demise of the main character, which occurs “off camera” and with little to no affect on the story, other than to leave the slog to the finish line with the markedly more drab sidekick Paul.

The Stone Man isn’t awful – indeed, largely favourable reviews insist otherwise. The story is decent, if at times absurd (eg: catatonic victims recite DNA sequences in our Latin alphabet, though the signal comes from outer space, where presumably the alphabet isn’t taught at Stone Man school), but much of my dislike stems from the quality of the final product. It’s not clean enough to send to agents, let alone publishers; yet here it is, in all its mistake-riddled ignominy.

Bullet points

So, in bullet points, here’s the kinds of mistakes and narrative inelegance one is forced to endure:

  • Incorrect words / word-order:
    • “reached the doorstep, and knocked in the door”
    • Although we’d only seen ever him in rant mode”
  • Redundant words/poor use of vocabulary:
    • “muttered, quietly” (how else might one mutter?)
    • “almost immediately” (might “imminently” be better?)
  • Mixed metaphors:
    • “having my head in the hangman’s noose and thinking that I’d seen someone coming towards me, carrying a pair of scissors” (what will scissors do to a rope?)
    • “once that thought had arrived, it grew infected roots” (either go down the infection motif, or down the weed-roots one)
  • Failed alliteration
    • “my usual routines of films and floating/swimming, feeling more and more restless” (no doubt, Smitherd added in “/swimming” because “floating” is an awkward synonym that nevertheless continues the F alliteration)
  • Repeated expressions
    • “someone’s face appearing in my mind’s eye
    • “and in my mind’s eye I saw the Stone Man walking on the map”
  • Overcomplicated sentences/overuse of gerunds:
    • “It occurred to me in that moment that Paul didn’t yet know I was a reporter – not wanting to lie, yet not wanting to make Paul doubt my motives, I’d just said I was a writer when I was giving him my backstory, and he hadn’t pursued it further – and seemed to think I was here purely motivated by the mystery, in a Richard-Dreyfuss-Close-Encounters kind of way.”
  • Loooooooooong woooooooooooorddddss
    • “LEAVE ME ALOOOOONNNEE!!! YOU SHOULDN’T BEEEEEEEE HEEEEERE!!”

The character that uttered that last one will forever in my head be played by Pierce Brosnan.

 

I can’t recommend The Stone Man, I’m afraid; but it’s important to note many other people would. It’s highly regarded (especially by those on Amazon) and enjoyed by many, despite the clumsy prose.

So, by all means, disregard this grumpy sub-editor’s review in favour of the droves of Goodreads and Amazon critics who loved it. In fact: buy it, read it, and let me know what you thought, for the simple sake of discussion. I’d love to hear from you.

And Luke? I don’t expect you to take the advice of an unpublished author, considering your success and prolificacy, but if you’re not already doing so, invest in an editor – your ideas are more than worth the outlay.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “The Stone Man – Luke Smitherd – [Book Review]”

  1. Thanks for the thoughtful review.

    I’m beginning to feel the drawbacks of listening to books on audible rather than reading them. It’s a season of life I can’t avoid since reading is only possible with two toddlers if I’m listening to it as I’m chasing minions, but it has definitely robbed me of some of the nuances.

    Having listened to the book read by a very talented narrator, I really enjoyed the story. I completely agree that the pacing was often infuriating. I also did note the way Mr. Smitherd levered in a powerful female character as sort of an afterthought.

    I agree with your conclusion that with a good editor Mr. Smitherd has some wonderful stories to tell. Just another in a long list of supporting arguments for getting a publisher, editor, or agent (or all three if you can tolerate the drawbacks).

    I look forward to reading your future reviews!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for reading Amy!

      To be fair, this book is practically written for audio recording, considering its essentially an audio transcript – although a few times it drops it for first-person, which was a shame.

      It reminded me of District 9 – the first half of that movie I thought was amazing, using interviews, TV footage and Wikus’s private video recordings to drive the story like a documentary. But at some point, they couldn’t figure out how to switch the audience’s empathy to side with the revolting-looking aliens without giving them dialogue. So the filmmakers dropped the documentary element and reverted to Hollywood cuts and subtitles. Still a good film, but I wish they’d persevered with the format.

      And thanks for following!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I was less than halfway through this book when I decided to simply stop reading. The premise is good, and it’s very easy to read. But just like you, I felt that there was a lof of useless and sometimes repetitive information.

    I found myself skipping complete sentences and even paragraphs just
    to get to the main point of what the character was trying to achieve. Unsurprisingly, I was able to still follow along without needing to go back for missing details.

    I do not care, at this point, if Andy and Paul die, or if they stop the Stone Man, or if they save the human race. Actually, I don’t even know if the human race needs saving. The initial sense of danger created by the Stone Man only lasted for a few pages. Even a character (Shaun, I believe) mentions that the novelty wears off after watching the same footage over and over again on TV. I think this perfectly captured my thoughts.

    Then the focus of the story slightly shifts to another character whose only reference is his hair color: Blondie (really?). Who is he? I still don’t know, and maybe I never will. It was after Andy and Paul spent who knows how many pages trying to get to and into Blondie’s house that I stopped reading and started looking for reviews instead.

    I do want to get some sort of closure, so I will probably just take a couple of days off this book and start again with a fresh mind, or mayble I will just continue to skim my way through the end. But at the moment I just don’t see the point. I did find out, however, that there is an “alternative ending” to this story, though it seems from other reviews that either of these endings left readers with more questions than answers.

    Anyway, I’ll stop now because I feel like I’m rambling just like Andy.
    My writing skills are nowhere near perfect or even average, nor will they ever be. I can only judge things as a reader, but I can see how editing is an important part of any book.
    Nice review 😉

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks Gonzalo. The “alternate ending” is actually described by Smitherd in his rambling post-text notes. I can’t remember it now, but it’s there if you wanted to seek it out.

      Have you read anything else by Smitherd? He seems to be doing very well – and good luck to him – but I wondered if his later works are a little more polished…

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s